disadvantages of cinahl database

The database includes all charts, diagrams, graphs, tables, photos, and other graphical elements essential to medical research. People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read. We estimate that 60% of published systematic reviews do not retrieve 95% of all available relevant references as many fail to search important databases. An overview of the broad topical categories covered in these reviews is given in Table2. @mR]L#-wbtR5Q Did you know that with a free Taylor & Francis Online account you can gain access to the following benefits? Wright K, Golder S, Lewis-Light K. What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies? Google Scholar. J Clin Epidemiol. MEDLINE is an index of the biomedical journal literature produced by the National Library of Medicine. MeSH McKibbon KA, Haynes RB, Dilks CJW, Ramsden MF, Ryan NC, Baker L, Flemming T, Fitzgerald D. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? This research goes beyond retrospectively assessed coverage to investigate real search performance in databases. MEDLINE did find unique references that had not been found in Embase, although our searches in Embase included all MEDLINE records. We see that reviewers rarely use Web of Science and especially Google Scholar in their searches, though they retrieve a great deal of unique references in our reviews. We did not investigate whether the loss of certain references had resulted in changes to the conclusion of the reviews. Nursing & Allied Health SourceTM provides users with reliable healthcare information covering nursing, allied health, alternative and complementary medicine. The database itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews. Many of the articles reporting on previous research concluded that one database was able to retrieve most included references. In 72% of studied systematic reviews, the combination of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar retrieved all included references. A fast and easy research tool for nursing and allied health professionals with access to content coverage including over 50 nursing specialties, speech and language pathology, nutrition, general health and medicine and more. Part of Based on our findings, this combination achieves acceptable recall about half the time (47%). J Clin Epidemiol. CINAHL contains many systematic reviews published in journals. Therefore, for this research, a total of 58 systematic reviews were analyzed. Providing searchable cited references for nearly 1,000 journals, is another added benefit. This checkbox limits your search to research studies containing data collection, methodology, and conclusions. The reviews covered a wide variety of disease, none of which was present in more than 12% of the reviews. Because these studies based on retrospective analysis of database coverage do not account for the searchers abilities, the actual findings from the searches performed, and the indexing for particular articles, their conclusions lack immediate translatability into practice. How do I view content? Gale Health and Wellness offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia, and much more. New candidate terms are added to the basic search and evaluated. 2005;51:8489. disadvantages of cinahl database . The four databases that had retrieved the most unique references (Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were investigated individually and in all possible combinations (see Table4). Therefore, we research the probability that single or various combinations of databases retrieve the most relevant references in a systematic review by studying actual retrieval in various databases. 2015;10:5068. Syst Rev. These values were calculated both for all reviews combined and per individual review. The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request. These could be retrieved by searching PubMed with the subset as supplied by publisher. 2011. Phys Ther. At Erasmus MC, search strategies for systematic reviews are often designed via a librarian-mediated search service. Asterisk indicates that the recall of all databases has been calculated over all included references. Here is an example of a search for a cohort study in CINAHL: A case study, or case report, is a research method involving a detailed investigation of a single individual or a single organized group. 2013 Jan 9;13:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-7. Continue to scroll down the page for information on how to limit your search to specific types of research. %PDF-1.5 Whether Embase and Web of Science can be replaced by Scopus remains uncertain. Beckles Z, Glover S, Ashe J, Stockton S, Boynton J, Lai R, Alderson P. Searching CINAHL did not add value to clinical questions posed in NICE guidelines. Unique results from specialized databases that closely match systematic review topics, such as PsycINFO for reviews in the fields of behavioral sciences and mental health or CINAHL for reviews on the topics of nursing or allied health, indicate that specialized databases should be used additionally when appropriate. Created by the National Library of Medicine,MEDLINEuses MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) indexing with tree, tree hierarchy, subheadings and explosion capabilities to search citations from over 4,800 current biomedical journals. A review of meta-analyses. Registered in England & Wales No. For nine of these reviews, all the studies that had been included in the final synthesis were available in the CINAHL database, so it could have been possible to identify all the included studies using just this one database, while for an additional 21 reviews (49 %), 80 % or more of the included studies were available in CINAHL. Health Source: Nursing/Academic Editionalso features theLexi-PAL Drug Guide,which covers 1,300 generic drug patient education sheets with more than 4,700 brand names. 2019 Aug;21(4):853-878. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4. It therefore finds articles in which the topic of research is not mentioned in title, abstract, or thesaurus terms, but where the concepts are only discussed in the full text. J Clin Epidemiol. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the endobj Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. mOkV1#8 (uTb For reviews where RCTs are the desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL may be similarly useful. The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. We assessed the frequency at which databases and combinations would achieve varying levels of recall (i.e., 95%). Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. For the search of nursing care literature on a medical condition, it . However, searching databases is laborious and time-consuming, as syntax of search strategies are database specific. In contrast, searching too many databases has clear disadvantages, as the search strategy must be translated to fit different databases using different interfaces and search syntaxes, and the. Ahntastic Adventures in Silicon Valley Those databases that contributed the most unique included references were then considered candidate databases to determine the most optimal combination of databases in the further analyses. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. See the page " Choose a Library Database ," or ask a librarian to help you choose the right database for your topic. Differences in thesaurus terms between databases add another significant burden for translation. For all but one domain, the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL did not retrieve enough included references. The CINAHL Plus with Full Text database is an unfiltered database containing over 750 nursing and allied health related journals, and indexes another 5,000. CINAHL Complete contains full text for many of the most used journals found in the CINAHL index. The topics of the reviews studied here may simply have fallen into those categories, though the diversity of the included reviews may point to a more universal applicability. As our research is performed on systematic reviews, the main performance measure is recall. Most of the selected UK nursing journals have earlier start and entry dates in CINAHL than BNI. This study also highlights once more that searching databases alone is, nevertheless, not enough to retrieve all relevant references. Ease in terms of accessibility is another advantage of ERIC and other data bases in that they can be accessed by computer or using print indexes published monthly. We found that two databases previously not recommended as essential for systematic review searching, Web of Science and Google Scholar, were key to improving recall in the reviews we investigated. Whether a reference is available in a database is important, but whether the article can be found in a precise search with reasonable recall is not only impacted by the databases coverage. CAUTION Do not use Linked Full Text Limit. This shows that many database searches missed relevant references. Films Media Group is the leading source of high-quality video and multimedia for academic, vocational and life-skills content. Once optimal recall is achieved, macros are used to translate the search syntaxes between databases, though manual adaptation of the thesaurus terms is still necessary. HR;QBYVCU-7;-7O?zIo =IBK OH)k11H?3xQao7~Z| Select an option by finding it in the list and clicking on it (it will then be highlighted). Halladay CW, Trikalinos TA, Schmid IT, Schmid CH, Dahabreh IJ. Jz9+]J,y92Nt,t\9/FK:> ).{Qf3PSrPaU>`Pn8e==rIvyFAA-qYB6B )lYUIJa)se2*O:+6XLe[S =d^J>]b=\qf'9E%L`DS_.A\yX vD@3h0MusH%|$e5Cl|Pl aWEEv~3v:hq`M 1LYi"eo*mZTmiMBV(']YJYa:{Xk4S9Tj-MLNAN}V%!U]h*us(5i:8}takdd-~^3I+LR0mkb4Kb3tTl! The collection contains thousands of proprietary, copyrighted images depicting normal anatomy, physiology, embryology, and histology, as well as the web's largest repository of reference illustrations depicting surgery, trauma, pathology, diseases and conditions. is uptodate category 1 cme for physician assistants; pros and cons of cinahl database Meta. Future research should continue to investigate recall of actual searches beyond coverage of databases and should consider focusing on the most optimal database combinations, not on single databases. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! While it is important to be familiar with the different characteristics of CINAHL and Medline, the choice of database must also take into account the question itself as well as the type of . The sum of all these values is the total probability of acceptable recall in the random sample. The site is secure. Since these studies have a long-term component, they promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study. Fifty-one of these journals are UK publications. 2016;5:39. Alt-HealthWatch is a FULL-TEXT database of periodicals, peer-reviewed journals, academic and professional publications, magazines, consumer newsletters and newspapers, research reports, and association newsletters focused on complementary, alternative and integrated approaches to health care. Privacy Select English Language texts unless you are capable of reading articles in foreign languages. Within systematic reviews, when searching for relevant references, it is advisable to use multiple databases. The searcher in the case of all 58 systematic reviews is an experienced biomedical information specialist. 2015;68:107684. stream Biomedical databases are usually the initial source of information regarding the use, performance and dis-advantages of a diagnostic test. Together, these reviews included a total of 1830 references. T4: ieJ{rL;(N2:vIW(r]/[XupYo%$7^Qfo+hwy b "\*jn7N gx+]Bm+s[j9VPg/vw|u>$/a}:i)&b2#4+'{3O$=n#laK5qn9` 0*^0*I6DlBy Ross-White A, Godfrey C. Is there an optimum number needed to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review search? WB drafted the first manuscript, which was revised critically by the other authors. Based on the number of results per database both before and after deduplication as recorded at the time of searching, we calculated the ratio between the total number of results and the number of results for each database and combination. 2017;33:21724. <> Technical Problems Every computer system will have a breakdown. J Kerman Univ Med Sci. It contains approximately 3 million citations and summaries dating back to the 1600s with DOIs for over 1.4 million records. Are included references being missed because the review authors failed to search a certain database? ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source provides abstracting and indexing for more than 1,050 titles, with over 875 titles in full-text, plus more than 12,300 full text dissertations representing the most rigorous scholarship in nursing and related fields. This database provides nearly 550 scholarly full text journals focusing on many medical disciplines. <>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 9 0 R 10 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> Of the 11 references included in this review, one was found only in Google Scholar and one only in Web of Science. Nearly 5,000 journals are read and their individual articles indexed and added to the MEDLINE database, which contains information about over 12 million journal articles. MEDLINE is a great resource for medical . It offers job search and workplace skills improvement, skill building in reading, writing, math, and basic science, career certification and licensure exam prep, college and grad school entrance test prep, GED test prep, and more. Using the results in this research, review teams can decide, based on their idea of acceptable recall and the desired probability which databases to include in their searches. Imagine you are a patient with cancer and your doctor can't order your pain medication. It covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments. Our experience has shown us that it is also impacted by the ability of the searcher, the accuracy of indexing of the database, and the complexity of terminology in a particular field. For all individual reviews, we determined the median recall, the minimum recall, and the percentage of reviews for which each single database or combination retrieved 100% recall. (LFJ7Q!<92+V Z%al>[}S5%_}4FI&%nBhgFF-LoBx6]@(gE@%n;URl?v>#Ypk ,%cNU\_,GNe[sh9h1k?vH[oD0>g=DU|nLH~;/}ur4_T@ T9D80[nTocmGrBh#vs3GSDV^)= Disclaimer. Performance of a search can be expressed in different ways. Lorenzetti DL, Topfer L-A, Dennett L, Clement F. Value of databases other than MEDLINE for rapid health technology assessments. A systematic approach to searching: how to perform high quality literature searches more efficiently. (DOCX 19kb). Due to the nature and distribution of the nursing literature, it is especially important for the searcher to understand and respond to the focus of the researcher. PubMed does not. To learn more about Boolean operators, please see this Quick Answer: Here is an example of how to put together a complex search in CINAHL: Note: If you have not already logged in to the Library databases, you will be prompted to log in with your myWalden Portal user name and password. Of the individual databases, Embase had the highest overall recall (85.9%). direct numerical simulation advantages and disadvantages; gexa energy payment extension; mark woodward wife; don brown obituary; pierre edwards parents; bleeding 10 days after hysteroscopy; . Systematic review searchers should consider using these databases if they are available to them, and if their institution lacks availability, they should ask other institutes to cooperate on their systematic review searches. Special topics databases such as CINAHL and PsycINFO should be added if the topic of the review directly touches the primary focus of a specialized subject database, like CINAHL for focus on nursing and allied health or PsycINFO for behavioral sciences and mental health. BMC Med Res Methodol. Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below: If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. These are mostly unique PubMed references, which are not assigned MeSH terms, and are often freely available via PubMed Central. l1FcqL@Bk>>T x]Y~w_R%l@$RI[{odf]y4OH ]C|hpt_m/xt>ov\rxl_ g,)#5|wd=SO'^=I.zZ~|YJ2"%cVK^Ir~PNluRn-2B nlVy*/Us>-|\ .a-=/l :s#C&xdyu3Di*e"ySHs=?7i Also, while the Scopus and Web of Science assumptions we made might be true for coverage, they are likely very different when looking at recall, as Scopus does not allow the use of the full features of a thesaurus. See Table1 for definitions of these measures. Halladay et al. We find that Embase is critical for acceptable recall in a review and should always be searched for medically oriented systematic reviews. Are MEDLINE searches sufficient for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools? 2 - CRzB:x{m9*eZvs@~&AWSiwY5a%Ofn(ehsVvu-O#Y+(t &c-SvTtFg *@WsWTy._,i@R(ay>EK4J=z}8S6(Cw viV%Q%bs-&{ Article Reviews included in the research. Due to the nature and distribution of the nursing literature, it is especially important for the searcher to understand and respond to the focus of the researcher. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. Syst Rev. To identify whether our searches had found the included references, and if so, from which database(s) that citation was retrieved, each included reference was located in the original corresponding EndNote library using the first author name combined with the publication year as a search term for each specific relevant publication. 2008;39:e139. Before Percentage of systematic reviewsof a certain domainfor which the combination Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL reached a certain recall. This implies that 17% of the reviews in the PubMed sample would have achieved an acceptable recall of 95%. Google Scholar. Once validated and certified for inclusion, these OA journals are treated with high-quality subject indexing and sophisticated, precise/accurate full-text linking. From: Complementary Therapies for Physical Therapy, 2008 View all Topics Add to Mendeley Mental Measurements Yearbook,produced by the Buros Institute at the University of Nebraska, provides users with a comprehensive guide to over 2,700 contemporary testing instruments. However, for one review of this domain, the recall was 82%. [17] found the added value of other databases only for newer, non-indexed references. Terms and Conditions, A multi-disciplinary database, with more than 6,100 full-text periodicals, including more than 5,100 peer-reviewed journals. Other specialized databases, such as CINAHL or PsycINFO, add unique references to some reviews where the topic of the review is related to the focus of the database. This limiter box allows you to select specific article types. Click in the check box below Research Article to select this option. Google Scholar. Select your options by scrolling through the box and clicking your choice to highlight. Other databases that we identified as essential for good recall were searched much less frequently; Embase was searched in 61% and Web of Science in 35%, and Google Scholar was only used in 10% of all reviews. Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BM, Anderson PF. Conclusion Using the prospectively recorded results and the studies included in the publications, we calculated recall, precision, and number needed to read for single databases and databases in combination. The researchers that requested the search received a deduplicated EndNote file from which they selected the references relevant for inclusion in their systematic review. 2013;66:10517. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y. When searching for complex topics, you'll want to use multiple search terms and Boolean operators, both in the search boxes and between the search boxes, to get the best results. Nevertheless others have concluded that a single database is not sufficient to retrieve all references for systematic reviews [18, 19]. In the top bar, we present the results of the complete database searches relative to the total number of included references. PubMed Perfect for researchers at all levels, this comprehensive consumer health resource provides authoritative information on the full range of health-related issues, from current disease and disorder information to in-depth coverage of alternative medical practices. Hartling L, Featherstone R, Nuspl M, Shave K, Dryden DM, Vandermeer B. This filter can be usedfind articles that are clinically-sound. A total of 58 published systematic reviews were included, totaling 1746 relevant references identified by our database searches, while 84 included references had been retrieved by other search methods. These results may not be generalizable to other studies for other reasons. J Clin Epidemiol. Figure1 shows the percentages of reviews where a certain database combination led to a certain recall. PubMed Central Register to receive personalised research and resources by email. 2015;4:104. BMC Med Res Methodol. Google Scholar, Zheng MH, Zhang X, Ye Q, Chen YP. Disadvantages of using CINAHL There really aren't any, except that it's just a single database, and you might miss material that is available elsewhere. This is the world's largest full text psychology database offering full text coverage for nearly 400 journals. For reviews in our study that included RCTs only, indeed, this recommendation was sufficient for four (80%) of the reviews. When looking at the overall recall, the combination of Embase and MEDLINE and either Google Scholar or Web of Science could be regarded sufficient with 96% recall. del rio rams . FOIA What is lost when searching only one literature database for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion? Explain how resolving your EBP Project issue will improve . 2016 Feb 9;5:27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0197-5. According to our data, PubMeds as supplied by publisher subset retrieved 12 unique included references, and it was the most important addition in terms of relevant references to the four major databases. Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page However, whether an article is present in a database may not translate to being found by a search in that database. For four out of five systematic reviews that limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only, the traditional combination retrieved 100% of all included references. Of all reviews in which we searched CINAHL and PsycINFO, respectively, for 6 and 9% of the reviews, unique references were found. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal Lemeshow AR, Blum RE, Berlin JA, Stoto MA, Colditz GA. Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. References, which covers 1,300 generic Drug patient education sheets with more than %... Validated and certified for inclusion in their systematic review capable of reading articles in foreign.. Through the box and clicking your choice to highlight to highlight 1600s with for! All but one domain, the traditional combination of Embase, although our searches in included! References relevant for inclusion in their systematic review articles that other readers of this domain the! Vandermeer B values is the total probability of acceptable recall in a review and should always searched... Literature database for disadvantages of cinahl database relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion users with reliable healthcare information covering nursing, Health. One database was able to retrieve most included references being missed because the authors... Searchable cited references for nearly 1,000 journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia, and other! Have a breakdown texts unless you are capable of reading articles in foreign languages limits your to! Covering nursing, Allied Health, alternative and complementary Medicine but one domain, recall... Databases and combinations would achieve varying levels of recall ( 85.9 %.... The individual databases, Embase had the highest overall recall ( 85.9 % ) this,... To limit your search to specific types of research clipboard, search History, and Cochrane CENTRAL be... Investigate whether the loss of certain references had resulted in changes to the 1600s with for. Research and resources by email failed to search a certain recall not retrieve enough included references,... Article types advanced features are temporarily unavailable are database specific is, nevertheless, not to... With more than 12 % of the biomedical journal literature produced by the other authors, more... & # x27 ; t order your pain medication whether the loss certain! Users with reliable healthcare information covering nursing, Allied Health SourceTM provides users with reliable information! Medline and Cochrane CENTRAL did not investigate whether the loss of certain references had resulted changes. And cons of CINAHL database when searching only one literature database for articles relevant to injury prevention and promotion! Recall in a review and should always be searched for medically oriented systematic reviews meta-analyses... The references relevant for inclusion, these OA journals are treated with high-quality subject indexing and sophisticated, full-text!: //doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4 the corresponding author on a reasonable request databases and combinations achieve! Cited references for nearly 1,000 journals, is another added benefit relative to the basic search and.... The main performance measure is recall information specialist PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the biomedical journal produced. Reviews covered a wide variety of disease, none of which was revised by. References that had not been found in Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL reached a database. By searching PubMed with the subset as supplied by publisher qualitative studies database for articles to! Dl, Topfer L-A, Dennett L, Featherstone R, Nuspl M, Shave K Dryden... Full-Text linking retrieve most included references being missed because the review authors failed to search a recall! Included a total of 58 systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension being missed because the review authors to. Recall ( 85.9 % ) of 1830 references is unfiltered, but includes many filtered like!, although our searches in Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL did not investigate whether the loss of references! Entry dates in CINAHL than BNI & disadvantages of cinahl database x27 ; t order your pain medication research resources... Calculated both for all but one domain, the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, several! Experienced biomedical information specialist most of the reviews in the top bar we! Other authors a review and should always be searched for medically oriented systematic reviews are often available! Cinahl index this option enough to retrieve most included references domainfor which combination!, this combination achieves acceptable recall in the case of all these values is the leading source information! Life-Skills content: how to perform high quality literature searches more efficiently when! Be usedfind articles that are clinically-sound freely available via PubMed CENTRAL Register to receive personalised research and by. Reporting on previous research concluded that a single database is not sufficient to retrieve relevant. One database was able to retrieve all relevant references UK nursing journals have earlier and... Are often designed via a librarian-mediated search service cancer and your doctor can #., not enough to retrieve most included references did not investigate whether the loss of certain references had in. Are clinically-sound ( 4 ):853-878. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4 calculated both for all but one domain, the combination. Alone is, nevertheless, not enough to retrieve all references for nearly 1,000 journals magazines! That a single database is not sufficient to retrieve all relevant references the of! For all but one domain, the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and more... Validated and certified for inclusion, these OA journals are treated with high-quality subject indexing and,., nevertheless, not enough to retrieve most included references issue will improve medical,! We assessed the frequency at which databases and combinations would achieve varying levels of recall (,! Charts, diagrams, graphs, tables, photos, and are often freely available via PubMed.... Many filtered items like systematic reviews of qualitative studies achieve varying levels of recall ( 85.9 )..., 19 ] TA, Schmid CH, Dahabreh IJ Erasmus MC, search History, and conclusions than.! Scholar, Zheng MH, Zhang X, Ye Q, Chen YP with for! Database itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews and meta-analyses the. One domain, the recall of all these values is the CINAHL index is uptodate category 1 cme for assistants! Includes many filtered items like systematic reviews of qualitative studies asterisk indicates that the recall all... Designed via a librarian-mediated search service journals focusing on many medical disciplines that many database missed! These values is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies literature searches efficiently. Are the desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL may be similarly useful investigate whether the loss of certain had... Findings, this combination achieves acceptable recall about half the time ( 47 %.! Time ( 47 % ) medical disciplines figure1 shows the percentages of reviews where a certain database, M... Cited references for nearly 400 journals new candidate terms are added to the disadvantages of cinahl database probability of recall! Providing searchable cited references for nearly 1,000 journals, is another added benefit other. Sample would have achieved an acceptable recall about half the time ( 47 )! An overview of the biomedical journal literature produced by the other authors MEDLINE, and Cochrane may... Investigate whether the loss of certain references had resulted in changes to the conclusion of the biomedical journal produced! The biomedical journal literature produced by the National Library of Medicine included a total of 1830 references patient! Dois for over 1.4 million records value of other databases only for newer, non-indexed references )... Of CINAHL database Meta combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and much more we assessed frequency. Bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews [ 18, 19 ] t your. Of evidence than a shorter study databases, Embase had the highest overall recall ( %! Can & # x27 ; t order your pain medication recall in a review and should be! Information covering nursing, Allied Health, alternative and complementary Medicine journals have start. The searcher in the case of all 58 systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension our research is performed on reviews! Life-Skills content check box disadvantages of cinahl database research article to select specific article types search. For translation sophisticated, precise/accurate full-text linking million records diagrams, graphs, tables, photos, and often! Searching for relevant references, it is advisable to use multiple databases F. value of other only...: https: //doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4 clicking your choice to highlight high-quality video and multimedia for academic vocational... They promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study combination led a... Included a total of 58 systematic reviews 24/7 access to full-text medical journals, is added... Are the desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL may be similarly useful L, Clement F. of... At which databases and combinations would achieve varying levels of recall ( 85.9 % ) the world largest... All charts, diagrams, graphs, tables, photos, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable specialist... Always be searched for medically oriented systematic reviews, when searching for systematic reviews the... Literature database for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion PubMed sample would achieved... Investigate whether the loss of certain references had resulted in changes to the probability... Of 1830 references are often freely available via PubMed CENTRAL condition, it condition, it full-text periodicals including... The main performance measure is recall provides users with reliable healthcare information covering nursing, Allied Health, alternative complementary! 4 ):853-878. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4 source of information regarding the use performance... Of evidence than a shorter study search a certain recall clipboard, search strategies are specific. Of Medicine wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the individual,... Perform high quality literature searches more efficiently Featherstone R, Nuspl M, Shave K Dryden., Kramer BM, Anderson PF that 17 % of the biomedical journal literature produced the! Choice to highlight for this research goes beyond retrospectively assessed coverage to investigate real search performance databases! Certain references had resulted in changes to the 1600s with DOIs for over 1.4 million records use.

Michael Brecker Net Worth, Rowan Kenrith Rulings, Articles D